Archive for July 23rd, 2008

Simpsons-Engraved iPods Are Great If You Don’t Have Your Own Laser Etcher [IPods]

Unlike certain other Fox properties, seeing the Simpsons continue to be milked for merchandising doesn’t fill me with quite so much rage, so these officially engraved iPods are cool for hardcore fans. But for the $80 premium over standard price for an iPod classic, I’m more inclined to take the one I already have to our pal Phil and burn in a portrait of Mr. Burns saying “Have the Rolling Stones kiilled.” [Fox On the internet Shop via Slash Gear]


Popularity: 2% [?]

Comments No Comments »

Apple touted healthy sales of Macs and iPods in a conference call yesterday, but it was a mysterious reference to future products that has created the most buzz today. In its quarterly earnings call Monday, Apple’s chief financial officer Peter…
Add to Reddit Add to Facebook Add to digg

Applebanner

Apple touted healthy sales of Macs and iPods in a conference call yesterday, but it was a mysterious reference to future products that has created the most buzz today.

In its quarterly earnings call Monday, Apple’s chief financial officer Peter Oppenheim alluded to a “future product transition” while explaining why Apple’s gross margins will drop from 34.8 percent to 31.5 percent between July and September. That kind of teasing reference — without any specifics, naturally — has got analysts, tech bloggers and Mac fans busily speculating over just what those products will be.

Leading the list: A revamped line of MacBooks, or perhaps the long-awaited touch-screen Mac tablet.

Andy Hargreaves, a consumer electronics analyst at Pacific Crest Securities, predicts a refresh of the current line of MacBooks and MacBook Pros. MacRumors blogger Arnold Kim thinks the same. This makes sense, because the MacBook and MacBook Pro are reaching the end of their product cycles.

But some other analysts are expecting more from Apple over the next few months. After all, Oppenheim did say Apple would be “delivering state-of-the-art new products that our competitors aren’t going to be able to match,” and an incremental upgrade to Mac notebooks doesn’t seem to live up to that statement.

Ken Dulaney, an analyst at Gartner, is putting his money on a touch-screen Mac tablet. Such a transition would be logical, he stated, since Apple already developed Cocoa Touch for iPhone — a toolkit for developing touchscreen-based interfaces, which could presumably be implemented into personal. This also makes sense in terms of the competition, since Dell, Nova and HP have long since offered their own, Windows-based tablet systems.

“The highest probability is [a tablet Mac] is what they’ll launch,” Dulaney stated in a phone interview.

Fortune magazine writer Philip Elmer-DeWitt thinks otherwise: a tablet Mac “would be a new product, not a product transition,” he notes in his column. He, too, bets on an overhaul for the MacBooks and MacBook Pros–just in time for when school goes back in session.

Any of these predictions can be correct, mainly because Oppenheim is tricky with his talk: First he gets us jazzed about new products by describing them as unmatchable and state-of-the-art, and then he blankets everything with the words “future product transition.”

Given the timing, I’m going to go with the more conservative guess: MacBooks and MacBook Pros running the Centrino 2 platform are the most likely new product to hit the market in the next few months. A touch-screen tablet Mac is likely further out on the horizon (because heck, if a teen can do it, so can Apple). That’s a product launch we’d be apt to see come January, 2009 at Macworld Expo.

(Photo credit: Yilka/Flickr)


Add to Reddit Add to Facebook Add to digg

Via [wired.com]

Popularity: 2% [?]

Comments No Comments »

First S60 Touch UI Screenshots Appear, Look Promising [Symbian]

A small bunch of S60 Touch UI screens popped up this day over at Mobile Royale, and they don’t look half bad. The design has massive on-screen buttons, clean design, and easy to read menus. The only item of concern is how narrow the header and footer bars are when the OS is in landscape mode. Seems like a breeding ground for repeated tapping. That said, I’m still excited to see the rest of S60 Touch. [Mobile Royale via Symbian Freak]


Popularity: 2% [?]

Comments No Comments »

Moments after AT&T posted a message on its site saying it would provide free Wi-Fi services to iPhone users, the company took it back. And AT&T spokespeople are keeping their lips sealed as to who or what caused the “error”…
Add to Reddit Add to Facebook Add to digg

Atthot_copy_2

Moments after AT&T posted a message on its site saying it would provide free Wi-Fi services to iPhone users, the company took it back. And AT&T spokespeople are keeping their lips sealed as to who or what caused the “error” — or whether free AT&T Wi-Fi is ever going to become a reality.

At approximately 9 a.m. PDT, AT&T removed the message from its site, which read, “AT&T knows Wi-Fi is hot, and free Wi-Fi even hotter, which is why we are proud to offer iPhone customers free access to the nation’s largest Wi-Fi hotspot network with more than 17,000 hotspots.”

“It was posted in error and was removed shortly thereafter, so it should not have been up,” said Seth Bloom, an AT&T spokesperson, in a phone interview. “We know how important Wi-Fi is and we intend to make it available to as many people as we have the ability to, but nothing can be announced this day.”

Another AT&T representative said almost the same thing, verbatim. Clearly they were both reading from the same script.

This isn’t the first time AT&T has teased iPhone users, either. In late April, iPhone users began receiving free AT&T Wi-Fi without any official announcement. Days later, that free access was no more.

Unlike in May, Friday’s snafu is a bit more embarrassing for AT&T since an announcement — official or not — appeared in writing. It’s practically irresponsible (not to mention condescending) for the company to refuse to comment on any prospects of free Wi-Fi: Why else would that message ever have been written? If it were “pushed live erroneously,” doesn’t that imply it’ll be pushed live eventually? And if so, why don’t they just tell us that?

Product page [AT&T)


Add to Reddit Add to Facebook Add to digg

Via [wired.com]

Popularity: 2% [?]

Comments No Comments »

Close
E-mail It